No products in the cart.

What You Need to Do to Fix DevOps

People sometimes have problems with DevOps and think about how to figure them out. In this article, we covered some DevOps problems and how to fix them.

Firefighters don’t just fight fires. Indeed, a common image is that you are in an emergency to extinguish a flame, save people from a burning building, and in some cases retrieve a cat from a tree.

But you are also involved in fire protection. The fire department also provides educational advice on the best ways to avoid fires, provides guidance to organizations on how to protect employees, and campaigns on fire safety issues such as the London Fire Brigade’s sprinkler legislative campaign.

It makes sense for the fire brigade to play this dual role. Firefighters have authority in the field of fire protection as their training and experience give them insights into fire protection.

What does this have to do with DevOps? Here are similarities to the two roles of the DevOps team in development and operations. Instead of two separate teams, one needs to work on the development of new features and the other team keeps running everything else, DevOps needs to form an integrated team that does both at the same time.

But what if there are too many fires to put out? When you are in a hurry from one fire to the next every day, you cannot expect the fire department to fulfill these other missions. Similarly, the DevOps team is aware that there is too much operation and is underdeveloped. And the DevOps promise hasn’t been fulfilled.

Dealing With Old Problems, Building New Problems

Image by StartupStockPhotos from Pixabay

DevOps’ promise was to create an integrated development and operations team. Previously, these were isolated teams with different roles. Developers typically need to introduce new features to their applications, but operations teams want to keep their applications stable after they are released. 

These two teams are in a sense in opposition to each other. Not exactly deadly enemies, but they have a goal in this conflict.

The operation is to stabilize and get things on track, but the development team wants to improve the functionality of the product. This involves all the risks. If the development team is absent for a while, the operations team will probably do an easier job.

Therefore, instead of the two teams pulling in opposite directions, DevOps creates a more unified one. It aims to promote collaboration, integration, and transparency between the two disciplines. The ops team is no longer restraining the development team, and the development team is no longer a headache for the ops team.

When it works, there’s a non-stop loop of improvement, improvement, testing, and deployment. Instead of conflicting Dev and Ops, we are heading withinside the identical direction.

These efforts can also additionally constantly launch required characteristic adjustments or additions. Like our unique analogy of the hearthplace department, the DevOps crew extinguished the hearthplace even by inventing new methods to save it for you.

Unfortunately, this is not always the way things work. Instead of freeing sources for greater powerful improvement, the focal point is more and more transferring to IT operations.

You want to awareness of follow-up, now no longer innovation, just like the hearthplace departments on days like November fifth and July 4th. Instead of mixing ops and dev groups, there are ops groups that cope with improvement from time to time.

This is a huge problem. If your DevOps crew makes a specialty of operations in preference to improvement, you lose the improvement side.

Experienced builders will waste time on their daily paintings if they are able to do plenty greater revolutionary things. And with professional employees who’re some distance from clean to rent so some distance, the waste is even worse.

How to Shift the Balance to Fix DevOps

This isn’t always unsolvable trouble. You can rebalance, and spot that DevOps is truly DevOps and fix DevOps.

The maximum critical step is to automate everything. This ought to be a DevOps lifestyle mantra. Trust the system and ensure the deployment is automatic and sufficient to be a non-event. That way, the company is prepared to install the system.

Even Friday afternoons will be “off-time” for deployment. Achieving this calls for each systematic coordination in the direction of pace predictability dreams and suitable toolkits.

Much of the paintings of Ops include acting recurring responsibilities with excessive precision to help in development. Automation manner that now no longer simplest does the operations crew have the stableness they want, however, they could effortlessly roll lower back adjustments as needed. 

The check additionally wishes for improvement. Continuous deployment can suggest an excessive frequency of releases, putting top-notch needs on the ones whose venture is to keep stability. Just as you want to automate your deployment to create predictable isolation surroundings for brand new features, you furthermore may want to run and run checks in parallel.

This series of checks is administered every time a devote is made. If all of them pass, the crew can awareness of a qualitative assessment of these adjustments. If they fail, save you adjustments from all of the sudden attaining manufacturing till the trouble is resolved and resolved. 

Automation is one thing, however, it’s simplest while paired with higher information of the way each procedure interacts, and the way a code alternate might also additionally have an effect on different applications, that we are able to ensure that non-stop deployment can provide on its promise. 


Ultimately, DevOps does not obsolete Ops or Dev. Both are important, neither is more important than the other. Operation without Dev means business stagnation.

It may be stable, but soon it will be overtaken by its constantly innovating competitors. Conversely, creating innovative and volatile products that fail just as badly is also unsustainable. 

It is not enough to remove the barrier between the two areas. To fix Devops, DevOps needs to be balanced, and without that balance, there is a risk that one will be considered more important than the other.

You may also be interested in:


Related Articles