No products in the cart.

What Are the Important Challenges of Patch Management?

There are some challenges that can be faced in Patch Management. In this articles, we covered some of the challenges and opinions about what to do.

Thousands of new operating system and application updates are released each year. All of these updates should be applied in a timely manner to avoid potential security incidents. 

Unfortunately, that is not the case. Many small businesses don’t easily recognize risk, but some don’t have the tools to track performance or get users to take action over time.

To remedy this situation, we need to consider what is blocking the patching process and how to streamline it in the future. Even if the team takes the patch seriously, it can be difficult to push updates these days.

Currently, according to a Ponemon Institute study, it takes about 28 days to patch the software. 

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security states that critical vulnerabilities must be fixed within 15 calendar days of the first discovery, and high-severity vulnerabilities must be fixed within 30 calendar days of the first discovery.

Similarly, the UK Cyber ​​Essentials security compliance program requires all critical and major vulnerabilities to be patched within 14 days. 

However, achieving these goals can be a difficult battle. Organizations face the challenge of releasing patches to protect their IT assets and applications from attacks. We need a new approach to automation, deployment management, and compliance tracking.

What Are the Hinders?

So we realize the risks, and we realize the timescales that we’re being requested to meet. What stops us from assembly the one’s deadlines? 

The first hurdle to conquer is that there are restrained IT assets internally – in different words, people – overseeing a couple of generation structures and tools. Smaller businesses generally tend to have a smaller group of workers or element-time assets to name, even as they will have restrained area expertise. 

Rather than the homogenous IT estates of yesteryear, IT groups now generally have a combination of structures to attend to nowadays consisting of Mac and Windows desktops, cloud offerings, and different assets. 

Photo by Pixabay from Pexels

Getting Faster in Patch Management

This makes patch control greater hard as there are greater structures to attend to. Employees are regularly disbursed or operating from anywhere, which could have an effect on the fulfillment of rollouts.

For Apple macOS, customers are on top of things after they approve patches for deployment too. This could make it more difficult to manipulate deployments, as customers won’t need to download big patches or experience cushty being liable for making an update.

Alongside this, it’s critical to realize that patches aren’t continually perfect. IT groups don’t want to mechanically push patches without checking them. This typically includes searching on the patch on some structures and sporting out their very own regressions earlier than manually compiling a patch fame report.

This can take a little time, especially if there are masses of updates to study simultaneously. Once the patches are examined and any incompatibility troubles are dominated out, then the updates may be deployed. This manner can take days to complete.

Another hold-as much as speedy patching may be policy. Patching is complicated to manipulate and includes numerous guide steps. For instance, protection updates may also have required beyond regular time to perform or wanted greater aid from the generation group to install place.

Over time, the motives for the one’s guidelines may also now not be in place, however, the guidelines will nonetheless require unique steps to be followed.

To improve the efficiency of patching, it is helpful to consider automation. This should include forming a group of users that can be grouped together with similar needs or levels of experience.

For example, you can create one group for computers that have been patched for testing, and then a second group for early adopters who are familiar with the application.

Photo by fauxels from Pexels

Then, in addition to these groups, you can define a general referral group that represents the majority of users for widespread deployment and a group that needs to be deployed later for security or compliance reasons.

You can make the process easier and more automated by patching different user groups with waves. 

Quickly patch basic operating system and security features. This should be done quickly to reduce the risk of attacks affecting users, rather than being obsessed with testing the application.

If the threat is big enough, don’t hesitate. As with, you should check your entire application inventory and use the most up-to-date app possible. This requires some confidence by letting these major vendors apply the patch. You can list trusted applications and update them automatically.

This also helps teams focus on these legacy apps and do more testing around them. Such applications, especially those that are not supported, are the most vulnerable and can be phased out over time if possible.

Finally, you can improve efficiency by consolidating patch data for reporting across multiple services and platforms. This eliminates some of the manual work that many teams currently need when working in parallel with multiple platforms such as Windows and macOS devices.

By automating this patch deployment process, you can indicate which process was completed successfully, direct all follow-up tasks to have the greatest impact, and fix issues that occur during deployment.

One approach to improve this is to integrate patch management with other approaches such as device management and authentication. User IDs are used to manage the applications that users can access, thus complementing patch management for the services they provide.

This helps simplify the work of system administrators, especially in remote work environments where users are at home or working in a hybrid manner, as patches can be managed as part of an integrated access policy.

Next month, dozens of new patches from companies such as Microsoft and Adobe will be available in the application. Other software vendors release their own updates to address security issues.

You can offload some of these releases and mitigate risk by building on an existing patching process. At the same time, this allows the team to better serve the company.

You may also be interested in:


Related Articles